Best single-server LAN with BM39?

simonpalmer123 wrote:
> We moved away from Bmgr this summer to a squid based proxy/nat system
> with LDAP/NTLM, and now realize the huge implication of proper eDir
> support for workstations. client trust is a great idea. Bmgr on 4yr old
> hardware was also much faster than our current system on brand new
> hardware. BMgr was doing 800-1200 concurrent connections. We moved away
> from BM because of lack of decent integrated filtering, (and it causing
> abends) but now would have preferred a seperate filtering box, at least
> we could have kept the great ACL support. (And I'm a squid and linux
> fan). If you've got client32 on most of your machines, I'd use
> Bordermanager for as long as possible. (We never logged any SR's in the
> 7 years we used it)

Agreed - bordermanager (and client trust, although the linux version of
that makes bad assumptions about single-userhood) is significantly
easier and just as efficient as squid, and at least leverages edirectory
(instead of the MS abomination :)