-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Not only that, but is there a reason this is a new reply to a
multi-year-old post? Is this a troll or just somebody not reading dates?
Either way the information is wrong.
Good luck.
Edward van der Maas wrote:
> ehtkhr wrote:
>
>
>> Dont forget that NW 6 and above doesnt support port 636. Only clear
>> text
>
> Completely incorrect. Where did you get this information from ?
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJK45wXAAoJEF+XTK08PnB5HUIQAKTZp4Y670 v3W+yK8Tk8ltuv
BOGQRN5pcfJARbm7wNeQDpUjlERsOkhQLWRs2ztkKDlgYUnBVn 5VtAT0YowQ05ie
jyw6J9XPGFVOgnh4jYSRx4GpNqoJs0EtBT3sGteIhU7fQWL6em LpDEct1Nl/0c0P
9TZUpMk1bF2kVCq5O1ZJtXmIsIDJo0Y7bv7aJX4cTosbXHm9in o+evS6bGHgoMX/
Zza1LDdx96LfwyT6qZ9JuDvNKEjYMl0ZjLecP8+uJNsBlBH1t9 1fDbplTZLpS59Y
UxZvWkCMEwxcWSPyemvNORaGhphZGg+JJYgKnmsClt08hBgfjg S09KjlNdK3y5bn
pfHMG7KB2r6wMl22vGrCkiMXi1UlDn3ZvB7eGifiZ+UnwdGRel 63115fgYsYzT8J
PM+hlFjlDiOGzYNjnUt1QZWjZ+01J/nmsnkRNg77wGVA8q6KeRGCy0hZyihY23b9
XqdukBDnt5vf4f22D9XUbiDR15/gYtF53HGJc8u52H9NjPOD1x5bZsTX4p65JQb4
YMz1wlKXnlFdk0pSvbrdF/+zfdjfqzs1XDjLP+OlxMtar4hP/WJrn/UR/moqsRki
O47+OcJ9djtLqVFXq22ernq8rjBx4HUmBk5hw8ZRyda13jcdP2 6Ej0Q2WREn/K7L
h3jHBu/81E/41qm+gF91
=2hE7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----