Mails are being sent twice when recipient is *.*

[mikebell90]

Markus wrote:
> Never tested to resend the same message.
>
> When the mail is send once, but received twice it is akward enough.
>
>
> >>> Michael Bell<mikebell90@no-mx.forums.novell.com> 22.10.2009 16:50 >>>
> Does a resend replicate the issue?
>
> Markus wrote:
> > it happens intermittently
> >
> > >>> Michael Bell<mikebell90@no-mx.forums.novell.com> 15.10.2009
> > 17:03:20 >>>
> > Markus wrote:
> > > No, there are no Custom 3rd Party objects installed.
> > >
> > > It happens with some workstation / users, but not for all.
> > >
> >
> > and it happens CONSISTENTLY with them? or intermittently?
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > >>> Michael Bell<mikebell90@no-mx.forums.novell.com> 15.10.2009
> > 03:15 >>>
> > > Markus wrote:
> > > > We want to enable *.*, because some mails have to be send to
> every GW
> > > user.
> > > >
> > > > When such a mail is sent twice automatically, in sent item
> there are 2
> > > > mails displayed with some minutes difference.
> > > >
> > > > But the user has definitely send it only one time.
> > > >
> > > > This is very anoying, because many users give a feedback like
> "Why did
> > > > you send the mail twice?..."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >>> Michael Bell<mikebell90@no-mx.forums.novell.com> 14.10.2009
> > > 06:21 >>>
> > > > jgrubbs wrote:
> > > > > Are you saying that they address to both the user
> specifically and
> > > then
> > > > > also to *.*? The reason *.* is sending to everyone is because
> > > that is a
> > > > > wildcard address for automatically sending a system wide
> > message. You
> > > > > must disable wildcard addressing if you don't want to allow
> > your users
> > > > > to be able to do this.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > don't think that's what they are saying. Does the properties
> of the
> > > > sent item show them as twice? Can you demonstrate with a screenshot
> > > > attached.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > any c3pos installed? That's all I can think of.
> > >
> > > Happens for ALL users sending to *.*?
> > >
> > > What about an absolutely clean-nofrills install
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Ok, well then, I guess I have nothing more to suggest. That would have
been a useful test.