Hi all,
as neither Novell nor Adaptec nor HP is willingly or able to help me, I've
to try again here.

The Basic facts in short:
adpt160m.ham reports the same device under two different luns on an scsi
channel.
Knoppix 4.x does *not* so, but correctly find only two devices.
All Firmware/Software is on latest version.
lun_enable is not supported anymore and superseeded by /LUNS

Anybody an idea?
Manu


we have a 2node proliant cluster with dualchannel Ultra3
adapteccontrollers and an infortrend
dualchannel scsi2ata external raid.

The Raidsystem has 2 logical drives with the follwing drive/channel/lun
configuration

Channel 0 ID 0 Lun 0 ->logical Drive 1
Channel 0 ID 0 Lun 1 ->logical Drive 2
Channel 1 ID 0 Lun 0 ->logical Drive 1
Channel 1 ID 0 Lun 1 ->logical Drive 2

I've connected channel1 of server1 to channel1 of infortrend and
terminated the channel
I've connected channel1 of server2 to channel2 of infortrend and
terminated the channel

In Netware6.5 (and in 6.0) I see FOUR devices on Server 1:
0x0013: [V321-A3-D0:0] Compaq 64-Bit Slot 0 Port 1 ID 0 IFT IFT-7250F [HDD]
0x001E: [V321-A3-D0:1] Compaq 64-Bit Slot 0 Port 1 ID 0 LUN 1 IFT IFT-7
[HDD]
0x003D: [V321-A3-D0:20] Compaq 64-Bit Slot 0 Port 1 ID 0 LUN 32 IFT IFT
[HDD]
0x003E: [V321-A3-D0:21] Compaq 64-Bit Slot 0 Port 1 ID 0 LUN 33 IFT IFT
[HDD]

and also on Server 2
0x0011: [V321-A3-D0:0] Compaq 64-Bit Slot 0 Port 1 ID 0 IFT IFT-7250F [HDD]
0x0019: [V321-A3-D0:1] Compaq 64-Bit Slot 0 Port 1 ID 0 LUN 1 IFT IFT-7
[HDD]
0x0038: [V321-A3-D0:20] Compaq 64-Bit Slot 0 Port 1 ID 0 LUN 32 IFT IFT
[HDD]
0x0039: [V321-A3-D0:21] Compaq 64-Bit Slot 0 Port 1 ID 0 LUN 33 IFT IFT
[HDD]

So I guess, the raid somehow mirrors channel 2 to high LUNS on channel 1
and vice versa?

Except for looking messy that would not be a problem, BUT:

if I create a partition on V321-A3-D0:1 and a shared pool USER on that
partition it appears
as a SECOND POOL WITH THE SAME NAME on V321-A3-D0:21

Those pools are not editable independently, if you delete/rename one,
you'll delete/rename both,
althoug one USER can appear as ACTIVE and the other as INACTIVE.

THAT is a problem for failover scripts, which fail and the resource goes
comatose.
The sympton only happens on partitions on logical drive 2 (with the LUN 1)
I have several other partitions/pools on logical drive 1 (LUN 0), which
behave normally.

--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/