On 8/22/2011 12:26 PM, akynaston wrote:
> Good ideas - I had assumed that 'NOT AN ERROR' was the developer's
> attempt to communicate that the ERROR_INVALID_INDEX itself wasn't an
> error and could be disregarded; who knows. I'll try the debugging
> tools, thank you for the ideas.

Were you able to resolve this? Can you please update what you found out
as I'm going through the same issue.