So in the IDM 4.02 docs they linked to one of my articles on Cool

Explaining GCV's. When I proofed the docs, I asked them to expand that
to link to part 2, and the Structured GCV ones, but so far as I can tell
from reading the docs and spot checking stuff I complained about they
just ignored all my input. Even on missed GCV's and factual stuff, not
opinion stuff (like this sentence makes no sense...)

Ah well. Whatcha gonna do.

Looks like they snuck it in around IDM 4 docs. Now to get them to do
more, rather than just remove it.