Not sure why I didn't think of this before.
In my experience the workorder driver can consume quite a lot of memory
at times so would it perform better using a remote loader even if this
is on the same machine?
This would at least let it have it's own memory, would it be even better
to have a separate "Remote loader" machine, maybe hosting several remote
loaders for Workorder, SQL, etc.

Not sure what is the bottleneck, the processor or the network.
Right now I have 2 remote loaders on the same machine as the IDM eDir is
running on. It's not a big system but it is updating quite frequently
and using triggerless DB connections maked heavy use of the memory.

Just wondering about server design in general here before adding too
much to the same machine.


joakim_ganse's Profile: https://forums.netiq.com/member.php?userid=159
View this thread: https://forums.netiq.com/showthread.php?t=48552