> I have done my home work now. And it is quite embarrassing as the thinks
> I was looking for was in part 1 of the series.

Shame! And if it is in part one, you cannot even use Lothar's mockery
of my verbosity as your excuse.

But good, I was pretty confident it was in there, I wrote it like 8
years ago now, so I do not remember the details, and would probably
re-read it myself to refresh. But I know the concepts.

Glad to hear it helped

> It is kind of working now. I get the instance back and the object gets
> an association, but to set an association value I have added the
> add-association after the instance.
> I would think that this should not be necessary but for now it works.

You can append the XML or you can use the add-assocation token at that