On 12-01-2019 9:46 PM, squadri wrote:

> You nailed it perfectly my friend. Its horrifying to know that the
> checksum didnt match and I had not focussed on that one possibility.
> However, did a fresh download and proceeded with fresh deployment of
> appliance after verifying checksum this time p . It shows both the
> clusters(IDP and Access Gateway) created.
> Appreciate your wonderful supporting ideas.

Glad its fixed

> Now moving to the next step. Our main objective is to protect our web
> based application with NAM. To begin with, we need to implement this
> solution to Groupwise WebAccess and SSPR for our eDirectory Users. Can
> you suggest the best possible and easy approach to do so?
> Please note that this is our first deployment of NAM4.4.

As per Ben's (ScorpionSting) response, both GW WebAccess and SSPR are quite well documented on how to successfully protect them with NAM. I do recall
that one version of GW WebAccess had an issue with accepting the authz header for SSO. Its mentioned in this forum in an older thread. I don't recall
what GW version was affected though.